Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brown El Bey v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
Marquis Brown El Bey
Respondent:
Warden Brian Emig, The Attorney General of the State of Delaware and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Connections, C.S.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant:
John Doe and Connections, C.S.P.
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAbee-Bey v. Cerino et al
as 1:2017cv01340
Plaintiff:
Terrance Paul McAbee-Bey
Defendant:
John A. Cerino, Joseph A. Haas, Karen E. Schreier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroman-Bey v. State of Delaware
as 1:2016cv00605
Petitioner:
Pernell Stroman-Bey
Respondent:
State of Delaware and Matthew Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown El Bey v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00401
Petitioner:
Marquis Brown El Bey
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown El Bey v. Wesley et al
as 1:2014cv01035
Petitioner:
Marquis Brown El Bey
Respondent:
Wesley, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Barzilai K. Axelrod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nassir-Bey v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01359
Plaintiff:
Zakii Malik Nassir-Bey
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Frank Pennell, Ronald Hosterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Emig et al
as 1:2010cv00782
Petitioner:
Sharif Mozaar Mustafa El Bey
Respondent:
Mark Emig, Philip Morgan, Joseph R. Biden, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Briscoe-Bey v. USA
as 1:2010cv00013
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Clarence Briscoe-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Riches v. Cochran et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr., Ulysses Torey, Jose Ernesto Medellin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
