Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferson v. Black
as 1:2024cv00729
Petitioner:
Earl C. Jefferson, II
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckstein v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Eckstein
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith and Jennifer Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckstein v. Lloyd et al.
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eckstein
Defendant:
Inspector Diane Lloyd, Warden Jennifer Black and Lutinent D. Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al.
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jason White
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, CO Kristen Dreezen, CO Brandon Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Black
as 5:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Keith R. Cooper
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckstein v. Black
as 1:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Eckstein
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Hartley et al
as 2:2023cv03954
Plaintiff:
Miciah Black
Defendant:
Christopher Hartley and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Black
as 1:2023cv02368
Petitioner:
Curtis L. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
