Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Lance Wood v. Paul Panther, et al
as 23-35407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE CONWAY WOOD and RENEE WOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL R. PANTHER, Deputy Attorney General, MARK KUBINSKI, Deputy Attorney General, BRENT REINKE, IDOC, Director of Prisons and others
Jody Carr v. Carlyn, et al
as 17-35317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JODY R.O. CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLYN, HIGGENS, Sgt., D. W. YORDY and others
Andrew Wolf, et al v. Idaho State Board of Corr., et al
as 17-35215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF and R. HANS KRUGER
Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, IDAHO COMMISSION FOR PARDONS & PAROLE, BILL YOUNG and others
Gretchen Cacciaguidi v. Brent Reinke, et al
as 17-35177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRETCHEN ANN CACCIAGUIDI
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT REINKE and OLIVIA CRAVEN
Stephen Cherry v. Dewayne Shedd, et al
as 16-35921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN A. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEWAYNE SHEDD, JEFF KIRKMAN, RANDY HIGGINS and others
Gretchen Cacciaguidi v. Brent Reinke, et al
as 16-35771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRETCHEN ANN CACCIAGUIDI
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT REINKE, OLIVIA CRAVEN, BRUCE WELLS-MOORE and others
Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Board of Correction, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schilling v. Panther et al
as 1:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Rodney Schilling
Defendant:
Paul Panther, Mark Kubinski, Leslie Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dixon
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Brent Reinke, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue et al v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brian Elliott Hogue, Gary A Butts, Gerald E Lind and others
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, LLC, Beeken Petty O'Keefe & Company, PharmaCorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
