Cases 1 - 10 of 265
MCGRATH v. BENTON et al
as 1:2023cv13006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGRATH, JR.
Defendant:
C.O. BENTON, C.O. HERNANDEZ, L.T. MARRUSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
HERBERT GRAY
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
LEROY BROOKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SLATER v. METRO SOUTH N.J. STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEMETRI SLATER
Defendant:
METRO SOUTH N.J. STATE POLICE, ANGELO TRAPANI, LESLEY SNOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. WHELTON et al
as 1:2021cv20568
Plaintiff:
HAMEED BROOKS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WHELTON, CRAIG MITNICK, HADDON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMER v. JOHN BROOKS RECOVERY CENTER
as 1:2021cv19531
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS PALMER
Defendant:
JOHN BROOKS RECOVERY CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABBOTT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv01026
Defendant:
MR. TEJADA, J. BROOKS, MS. BARFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD S. ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABBOTT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2021cv01026
Defendant:
MR. TEJADA, J. BROOKS, MS. BARFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD S. ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COTTERREL v. FULLER et al
as 1:2020cv18768
Plaintiff:
STEPHAN TOMOREY COTTERREL
Defendant:
MR. MCDOWELL, MS. FULLER, MS. BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADREY v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2020cv16034
Defendant:
SGT. SOWELL, OFFICER GUNZALEZ, OFFICER E. BANKS and others
Plaintiff:
JASON R. MADREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
