Cases 1 - 10 of 13
STALLWORTH v. BYNUM et al
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E STALLWORTH
Defendant:
D L BYNUM, GLENN HANCOCK and T BOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Seminole County Courthouse et al
as 6:2021cv01057
Defendant:
Winter Springs Police Department, Daniel Gharety, Seminole County Courthouse and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Adam Wilkerson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Winter Springs Police Department et al
as 6:2021cv00757
Defendant:
Winter Springs Police Department, Bryana Bynum, Seminole County Courthouse and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Adam Wilkerson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv24966
Plaintiff:
Ricky Nelson Bynum
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bynum v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv23142
Plaintiff:
Ricky Nelson Bynum
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reese v. Gooding et al
as 3:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Reese
Defendant:
David M. Gooding, Jeffrey Lawrence Barrett, Virginia Norton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friedler v. Corizon Correctional Healthcare Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00226
Plaintiff:
Robert Ryan Friedler
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Healthcare, Mike Scott, Scott A. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYNUM v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2012cv01043
Respondent:
State of Florida
Petitioner:
ALRAH BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BYNUM v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2012cv00210
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
ALRAH BYNUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2010cv00679
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
