Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Flowers v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ernest M. Flowers
Defendant:
Major Carter, Capt. C. L. James, Sgt. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LAWSON et al
as 4:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
GERRARD D JONES
Defendant:
EMANUEL LAWSON, TECH CARE X RAY INC, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
GERRARD D'ANDRE JONES
Defendant:
TORREY M JOHNSON, SPEIGHTS, BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. LAWSON et al
as 4:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
GERRARD D JONES
Defendant:
C L HODGSON, JEFFREY T BEASLEY, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gerrard D. Jones
Defendant:
Torrey M. Johnson, Antonio M. Hudson, C L. Hodgson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv20793
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Thomas Ried, McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLAR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
RAYL LYNN KELLAR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , FLORIDA CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL AUTHORITY , C L WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Mau v. Lockett et al
as 5:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Clinton Mau
Defendant:
C. L. Lockett, D. Drew, FNU O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. CREWS et al
as 4:2013cv00230
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, GLEN YOUNG, C L WEST, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 4:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J BROWN
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLENN YOUNG, R SURLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
