Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fails v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2021cv05228
Plaintiff:
John D Fails, Jr
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett v. Porter et al
as 1:2020cv02117
Defendant:
Mrs. Hooper, Mrs. Porter, Warden E. Sheldon and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bair v. Madison Correctional Institutuion et al
as 2:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Carl Jay Bair, II
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Institutuion, State Of Ohio, Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. President of JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2015cv02446
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
President of JP Morgan Chase & Co., V. Relief, Railroad Commission of Oil and Gas Division (Drilling Permit Unit) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Orlando Carter
Defendant:
Standard Guaranty Insurance Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch et al v. United States et al
as 1:2012cv02238
Plaintiff:
Edward Welch, John Roosevelt Baccus, Patrick Strozier and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Benita Y. Pearson, Thomas J. McAvoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keaton v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
as 1:2009cv00693
Plaintiff:
Chase Keaton
Defendant:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Chairman/Chairperson of the Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Current Director and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Howard v. Chase
as 1:2007cv01165
Petitioner:
Edgar William Howard
Respondent:
Alexis Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
