Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv01458
Petitioner:
Barry Chester Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
O'Quinn v. Tuell et al
as 3:2024cv50096
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Defendant:
Tuell, Sy and Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pughsley v. Illinois Dept. of Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv03524
Plaintiff:
Roy Kafferty Pughsley
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Human Services, Chester Mental Health Center and Trey Lazenby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Chester Mental Health Center et al
as 3:2023cv02911
Plaintiff:
Antwon R Newell, Jr.
Defendant:
Chester Mental Health Center and Travis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Quinn v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv50276
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03078
Plaintiff:
Chester McCoy
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rusk v. Mueller et al
as 3:2023cv00953
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rusk
Defendant:
Cailee Mueller, Doctor Kahn and Chester Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Chester Mental Health Center
as 3:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Patrick V Weaver
Defendant:
Chester Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rusk v. Mueller et al
as 3:2023cv03067
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rusk
Defendant:
Cailee Mueller, . Kahn and Chester Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Chester
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
