Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Nichols v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00584
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jade Christian Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nichols v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00585
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jade Christian Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nichols v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00586
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jade Christian Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Christian v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00353
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Cornelius Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gravlee v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee
Defendant:
FNU Tibbs, FNU Prince, FNU Kala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gravlee v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee and John Kennedy
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Garfield County Authority, Oklahoma Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brauning v. Brooks et al
as 6:2023cv00349
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
Michael Brooks, Jared Strand, Shannon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brauning v. Brooks et al
as 5:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
Michael Brooks, Jared Strand, Shannon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brauning v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
John Gilbert Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Prather v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Natalie Prather
Defendant:
John Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
