Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Woods v. State of Vermont, Department of Health et al
as 2:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
George E. Woods, Jr., Joseph J Truszkowski, Tyler J. Glodgett and others
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Department of Health, Mark Levine, James Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Touchette et al
as 2:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Doug Densmore, Michael Touchette, Tyler Bixter and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preterotti v. Lora et al
as 1:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
John M. Preterotti
Defendant:
Christopher Lora and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anzovino v. Pallito et al
as 5:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Michelle Anzovino
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito , P. Mark Potonas , Christopher P. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurston v. Pallito et al
as 5:2013cv00316
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thurston
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito, Scott Morley and Bob Arkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. C.E. Bradley Laboratories, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Tate
Defendant:
C.E. Bradley Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brumett v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00320
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Brumett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brumett v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00108
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Brumett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cafferky v. Pallito
as 1:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Cafferky
Defendant:
Andrew Pallito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seifert v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Christopher Seifert
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Andrew Pallito and Kevin Oddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
