Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Douglas Keith Casey v. Wayne Reaud et al
as 2:2023cv09194
Plaintiff:
Douglas Keith Casey
Defendant:
Wayne Reaud, CIA, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heizelman v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Robert Heizelman
Defendant:
Biden, FBI, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Junior Tejeda v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 5:2022cv01568
Plaintiff:
Junior Tejeda
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency and Unknown CIA Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Rollings v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 2:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rollings
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, FCI Terminal Island, Western District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Rollings v. Trump et al
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rollings
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, F.C.I Terminal Island, Western District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Frederick Banks v. The CIA et al
as 2:2020cv10769
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, LA Warden, The CIA and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dennis Petillo Jr. v. CIA Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2017cv01425
Defendant:
CIA Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
Dennis Petillo, Jr
Khamo v. FBI et al
as 2:2016cv03045
Plaintiff:
Fabian Khamo
Defendant:
FBI, NSA, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 2:2015cv01163
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. U.S. Government et al
as 3:2012cv05622
Plaintiff:
Jose Ulysses Padilla, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Government, DEA, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
