Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MCCRACKEN v. COUNTY OF UNION NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv20268
Plaintiff:
TED MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF UNION NEW JERSEY, CORRECTION OFFICER HOLMES, VICTORIA L. KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUENTES v. ANDERSON
as 2:2020cv04365
Petitioner:
CLEMENTE SILVINO CASTIL FUENTES
Respondent:
WILLIAM ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GARRETT v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv02525
Defendant:
LAMIKA DELORES GARRETT-ROBINSON, KHAMAYA ALLENDA JOHNSON, CARETTA CASSONDRA GARRETT and others
Plaintiff:
ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAUTISTA-SILVA v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2013cv00869
Petitioner:
CLEMENTE BAUTISTA-SILVA
Respondent:
JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLEMENT v. HAUCK et al
as 3:2012cv05234
Petitioner:
COURTNEY CLEMENT
Respondent:
WILLIAM HAUCK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MULLEN v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2010cv00839
Petitioner:
MARTIN CLEMENT MULLEN
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. MELFI, et al
as 1:2008cv01559
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BROWN
Defendant:
MELFI, CLEMENT and SIENNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BECKER v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2007cv05421
Petitioner:
JAN F. BECKER
Respondent:
HUDSON, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT A. FIATAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04811
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv04371
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
