Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Evans et al v. DOC Commissions et al
as 1:2020cv01663
Plaintiff:
Kwai Tilghman, Dayquan Hargroves, Jamar Robbins and others
Defendant:
Governor John Carney, All Wardens of the State of Delaware's Penitentaries and DOC Commissions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Carr
as 1:2019cv01909
Defendant:
Vincent Carr
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Haqq Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Daniels et al
as 1:2018cv01634
Plaintiff:
George A. Jackson
Defendant:
Connections, Incorporated, Perry Phelps, Marc Richman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Markell et al
as 1:2015cv01184
Plaintiff:
Shamsidin Ali
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Robert Coupe, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flamer v. Cooper, et al.
as 1:2014cv01465
Plaintiff:
John Flamer
Defendant:
Carla Cooper, Dennis Russell, Jon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flamer v. Carr et al
as 1:2014cv01277
Plaintiff:
John Flamer
Defendant:
Vincent Carr, Dennis Russell, Scharff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Coupe et al
as 1:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Black
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Vincent Carr, James Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2013cv01354
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez, Mary Lou Blades, Ms. Barbara and others
Defendant:
Stanley Taylor, Carl Danberg and Department of Corrections Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Danberg et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Robert Saunders
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Vincent Carr, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodt v. De Haven et al
as 1:2009cv00641
Petitioner:
Ronald Howard Brodt, Sr.
Respondent:
E. De Haven, William O. Carr, Thomas E. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
