Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Cason v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv01153
Petitioner:
Terry Jerome Cason
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GILLIAM v. CASON et al.
as 1:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MATHIS GILLIAM
Defendant:
JODI CASON and DENISE R FERRERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cason v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas)
as 8:2022cv00454
Petitioner:
Demetrius D. Cason
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Cason
as 6:2021cv00907
Defendant:
Keisha E. Cason
Plaintiff:
Darby Lance Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Cason
as 5:2021cv00294
Defendant:
Keisha E. Cason
Plaintiff:
Darby Lance Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2019cv00589
Plaintiff:
Olajuwon R. Simmons
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Cason Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cason v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv02089
Petitioner:
Demetrius D. Cason
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cason v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv01136
Petitioner:
Terry Jerome Cason
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Teal v. Bondi et al
as 3:2015cv01402
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kevin Teal
Defendant:
Pamela Jo Bondi, Julie Jones, Jeff Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason v. United States of America
as 6:2013cv01476
Petitioner:
Terry Jerome Cason
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
