Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Moore v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv01364
Defendant:
Sheri Banton, Bobby Lumpkin, Tawn A Kent and others
Plaintiff:
David T. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Handcock et al
as 4:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Domanick J Murphy
Defendant:
Carla Bayliff, RN Ryan Handcock, FNP A. Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Poffinbarger et al
as 4:2020cv02428
Defendant:
Ms. Sandra Poffinbarger, Mr. Calvin Simmons, Mr. Arnel Chan and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Clifton Lamar Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Selman et al
as 4:2019cv01737
Respondent:
C. Lee, S. Logan, k. Gunter and others
Petitioner:
Vernon King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lau v. Jennings
as 4:2013cv02647
Petitioner:
Chan Wing Lau
Respondent:
David W Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lau v. Jennings
as 4:2013cv01679
Petitioner:
Chan Wing Lau
Respondent:
David W Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lau v. United States Department Of Justice
as 4:2013cv01465
Petitioner:
Chan Wing Lau
Respondent:
United States Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lau v. Holder et al
as 4:2013cv01387
Petitioner:
Chan Wing Lau
Respondent:
Eric H Holder, Janet Napolitano, David W Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Uzomba v. University Health Systems et al
as 5:2013cv00177
Defendant:
James Anderson, Chan Choon, University Health Systems and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Uzomba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility, et al
as 5:2013cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jose Sauceda Chan
Defendant:
Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility and Dalby Correctional Officers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
