Cases 1 - 10 of 36
TIERNEY v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24772
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M TIERNEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DONALD LEAVINS, PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNEY v. SCRUGGS et al
as 3:2023cv24768
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M TIERNEY
Defendant:
SCRUGGS, B WENTZ, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARGUELLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv08090
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER N ARGUELLES, AMBER RAELYNN ARGUELLES and CHRISTOPHER M ARGUELLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
SPRUILL v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2022cv10871
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M SPRUILL
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hambrock v. Monroe County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2022cv10042
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Hambrock
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Medical Care Provider and Richard A. Ramsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv01550
Petitioner:
Christopher M. Hatton and Thomas Terrill Foster
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TIERNEY v. HARRISON et al
as 4:2021cv00174
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JOSEPH VARNUM, BENNETT and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M TIERNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARGUELLES v. USA
as 3:2021cv00417
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER M ARGUELLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watkins v. Deal et al
as 6:2020cv01948
Defendant:
Kent Woody, Robert Downs, Alan Seilbeck and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spence v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01052
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Christopher M. Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
