Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Aplin v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Colby Aplin
Defendant:
B. Smith, Dewald, Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin et al v. Oregon State Hospital
as 6:2020cv02178
Plaintiff:
Jim Warberg, Colby Aplin and Robin Vickio
Defendant:
Oregon State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aplin v. Fraiser
as 3:2020cv01359
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin
Defendant:
Fraiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aplin v. Garrick et al
as 3:2018cv01124
Defendant:
Mark Swanson, Mr. Blaska, Nora Mains and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Multnomah County Inverness Jail
as 3:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Multnomah County Inverness Jail
Plaintiff:
Colby Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramos v. State of Oregon
as 3:2018cv00339
Petitioner:
Colby Ramos
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aplin v. Multnomah County Inverness Jail et al
as 3:2017cv02061
Plaintiff:
Colby Aplin
Defendant:
Larissa Danilevski, Andrew Freitas, James MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin v. Weathersby et al
as 3:2017cv01921
Plaintiff:
Colby Aplin
Defendant:
Legacy Emanual Hospital, Portland Police Beureau and Barbara E. Weathersby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01628
Defendant:
Amy Atchison, Lt. Bael, Officer Barth and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Ramos and Ramon Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01472
Defendant:
And other to be named at a later time., Amy Atchison, Lt. Bael and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin and Ramon Ramos
OSCI:
Officer Box
BHS:
Ms. Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
