Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Freeman (ID 43826) v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Charles Leroy Freeman, III
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Heneck (ID 112732) v. Corby et al
as 5:2023cv03166
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Heneck
Defendant:
Brett Corby, Centurion, Tommy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coles v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03183
Petitioner:
Ian Barkley Coles
Respondent:
Don Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv03250
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lee Cole
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, (fnu) Garcia, (fnu) Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv03219
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Green
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail and Lisa Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03213
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2021cv03124
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Petitioner:
Martin E. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Bell et al
as 5:2020cv03163
Defendant:
Devin Flowers, Christopher Loya, Raymond Stiggens and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rumph v. Shawnee County Jail et al
as 5:2020cv03139
Defendant:
Shawnee County Jail and Brian Cole
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Rumph, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
