Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BROWN v. CAUGHRON et al
as 1:2020cv01184
Defendant:
WARDEN ZOOK, S.A. CAUGHRON, MAJOR KING and others
Plaintiff:
MILTON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLLINS v. CAESAR
as 1:2018cv00513
Petitioner:
LEWIS-SAUNDERS: COLLINS, II
Respondent:
ANGELA D. CAESAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MOSQUERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv02160
Plaintiff:
OMAR ANCHICO MOSQUERA, CALVIN SOLOMON, MARK ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and KNOWN AND UNKNOWN ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENTLEY v. USA
as 1:2011cv01633
Petitioner:
COLLIN BENTLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MOTEN v. HATCH et al
as 1:2011cv01556
Plaintiff:
JESSE T. MOTEN
Defendant:
ORRIN HATCH, AUDREY B. COLLINS, ANTHONY W. ISHII and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLINS v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
as 1:2011cv00423
Petitioner:
DAVID L. COLLINS
Respondent:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLLINS v. DISTRICT COURT, et al
as 1:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. COLLINS
Defendant:
DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv00625
Plaintiff:
DONVILLE JAMES
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, PATRICK FITZGERALD, PATRICK COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOVE et al v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES et al
as 1:2009cv02316
Plaintiff:
THEODORE SHOVE, RICHARD J. VIEIRA, PAUL C. BOLIN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, AUDREY COLLINS, MANUAL REAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
