Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bennett v. County of Lycoming et al
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Jamal Bennett
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Brad Shoemaker, Matthew McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cupp, et al v. County of Lycoming et al
as 3:2020cv01784
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Jennifer Mull, Christopher J. Ebner and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fudge v. Overmyer et al
as 1:2014cv01923
Petitioner:
Maurice Fudge
Respondent:
Michael Overmyer, District Attorney of the County of Lycoming and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSLEY v. WALSH et al
as 1:2014cv01507
Petitioner:
Darsean Mosley
Respondent:
J. Walsh, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYCOMING and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSLEY v. WALSH et al
as 2:2014cv02648
Petitioner:
DARSEAN MOSLEY
Respondent:
J. WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYCOMING and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2014cv00631
Petitioner:
Allen Smith
Respondent:
John Wetzel, PA State Attorney General and District Attorney of the County of Lycoming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2011cv06229
Petitioner:
JANET LOUISE MARTIN
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYCOMING and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norris v. County of Lycoming et al
as 1:2007cv00907
Plaintiff:
Leon Norris
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, David Desmond, Catherine Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SCI-MUNCY PA, 17756 et al
as 2:2007cv00615
Petitioner:
LEIGH ANNE JONES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHAMBERLIN and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYCOMING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
