Cases 1 - 10 of 33
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
Transunion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04151
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
TransUnion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilroy Watkins v. Illinois Department of Child & Family Services
as 1:2022cv07341
Plaintiff:
Kilroy Watkins
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Child & Family Services, Marc D. Smith, Francisco Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lake County Jail, et al
as 1:2022cv02890
Plaintiff:
Jamel D. Smith
Defendant:
Lake County Jail and Wellpath Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ek et al
as 4:2022cv04048
Plaintiff:
Antwon D Smith
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Kasey Kramer, Nellie Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv06176
Plaintiff:
Jamel D. Smith
Defendant:
Lake County Jail and Wellpath Heath Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv01172
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
D. Smith, K. Brookman and J. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv06359
Defendant:
R. Williams, John Doe One, J. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Ryan et al
as 3:2018cv03099
Plaintiff:
Vanoka Washington
Defendant:
Stephan Ryan, . Cortes, D Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stover et al
as 3:2018cv01023
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Smith
Defendant:
Jessica D. Stover, C. Thomas Holt, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
