Cases 1 - 10 of 19
WHITEHEAD v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LAURA MCCARTHY, KOESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. GRAMMAR et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
RICKI LEA STEWART, JOHNATHAN RAMSEY, PEACHES RIDGEWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. DE LA CRUZ et al
as 5:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
DE LACRUZ, JAY WALKER, SEALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beatrice v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv00713
Plaintiff:
Cody Beatrice
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Ms. De La Cruz, V. Mesa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. United States Of America
as 0:2020cv60704
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Braulio De La Cruz Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tomala-De La Cruz v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv00345
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Roberto Valentin Tomala-De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ewers v. Metro West Dentention Center et al
as 1:2018cv23946
Defendant:
Lieutenant Wilson, Any Warden/Supervisor in Charge of Facility known as Metro West Detention Center or this Municipality, Aramark Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Ainsley Leo Ewers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv01035
Plaintiff:
Roberto Valentin Tomala De La Cruz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
De La Cruz Valverde v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv02475
Plaintiff:
Felix J. De La Cruz Valverde
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
De La Cruz v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv23436
Plaintiff:
Ramalyn Ulloa De La Cruz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
