Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jose Sanchez Jimenez v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2022cv06401
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez Jimenez
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Main Office et al
as 5:2022cv01523
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Main Office, Bureau of Prisons Regional Office, U.S. Armed Forces Reserve Centre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Andrew Suh v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2022cv05447
Petitioner:
Andrew Suh
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Suh v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2022cv04581
Plaintiff:
Andrew Suh
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jose Sanchez Jimenez v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2022cv03855
Petitioner:
Jose Sanchez Jimenez
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Suh v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Andrew Suh
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00986
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Demond Hershawn Little v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2021cv03725
Plaintiff:
Demond Hershawn Little
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom and Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Dale Catchings v. Jacqueline Seabrooks et al
as 2:2021cv00284
Defendant:
Jackey Lacey, Unk US Dept of Justice Official, Jacqueline Seabrooks and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dale Catchings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Doyle Young v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 2:2019cv06416
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, United States, Judicial Conference Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
