Cases 1 - 10 of 19
BIGGS v. RIVERBEND DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2022cv03733
Petitioner:
ASHTON DEAN BIGGS
Respondent:
RIVERBEND DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BIGGS v. RAPIDES PARISH DETENTION CENTER 3
as 1:2022cv03725
Plaintiff:
ASHTON DEAN BIGGS
Defendant:
RAPIDES PARISH and RAPIDES PARISH DETENTION CENTER 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUSTE v. FIOROTTO et al
as 1:2018cv02968
Defendant:
BUFFALO FEDERAL DETENTION FACILITY DETENTION CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL and FIOROTTO
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2017cv00895
Defendant:
IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL T. PHILLIPS, TODD L. TRYON and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00712
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant:
JEFFREY SESSIONS, TODD L. TRYON, BUFFALO FEDERAL DETENTION FACILITY DETENTION CENTER OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REYNOLDS v. CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2017cv00207
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A ELLIS
Defendant:
GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. CANNON et al
as 1:2016cv00896
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
AL CANNON and SHERIFF AL CANNON DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00880
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, NADIA PRESSLEY, CURTIS BROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. FAYETTE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2014cv01297
Plaintiff:
PERRY HARPER
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and F. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
