Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Drake v. Adult Parole Authority et al
as 1:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Marcus Drake
Defendant:
Adult Parole Authority, Warden A. C. Smith and Parole Officer Danielle Lesko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Marquis
as 1:2018cv02937
Petitioner:
Howard L. Drake
Respondent:
Warden Dave Marquis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Bennett et al
as 2:2018cv00592
Plaintiff:
Terry A. Collins
Defendant:
Drake E. Bennett , William M. Hughes and Jeremy R. Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. Jillerat et al
as 1:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
Rahson Staples
Defendant:
Cody Jillerat, Popp, Neil Roger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Oninku et al
as 1:2017cv00599
Plaintiff:
Marquez Coleman
Defendant:
Jonas Oninku, Edwin Bailey, Brendan C. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nice v. Velez et al
as 1:2017cv01062
Defendant:
Sgt. Kathryn Bieber, Armour, Warden Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Nice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nice v. Velez et al
as 1:2016cv02405
Defendant:
Velez, John and Jane Does 1-3, John and Jane Does 11-13 and others
Plaintiff:
Nice and Kayla Nice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Donini et al
as 1:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Donald Jamal Wilson
Defendant:
Marty V Donini, John Koch, Adam Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 3:2007cv03090
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, G. W. Bush, Paul D. Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson et al v. Clinton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2007cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jtton Edward Watson and Alon Russell
Defendant:
Clinton County Sheriff's Office, Mail Intake and Outgoing Station, Rick Leisure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
