Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Gary Rosales v. Q. Byrne, et al
as 23-15081
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY CRAIG ROSALES
Respondent / Appellee:
Q. BYRNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Anthony Posey v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 23-15044
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY MERITT POSEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JEREMY BEAN and others
Gladys Perez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 22-15279
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLADYS PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, FLORENCE MCCLURE WOMEN'S CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Manuel Melendez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 21-17135
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL MELENDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Wilson Peters v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-16508
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILSON O. PETERS
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Joseph Anderson v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-16502
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOSEPH D. ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellant:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Angel Torres v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-16392
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGEL TORRES
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Angel Torres v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-16292
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGEL TORRES
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brandyn Gayler v. HDSP, et al
as 18-15706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDYN WILLIAM GAYLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Jeffrey Depenbrock v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-15606
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT DEPENBROCK
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
