Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Richmond (ID 89835) v. Schnurr
as 5:2024cv03137
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Petitioner:
Albert Eugene Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams (ID 117388) v. Kincaid et al
as 5:2024cv03135
Defendant:
Ramon Collins, Laura Kelly, Sherri Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Boe W. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wynn (ID 65699) v. Schnurr
as 5:2024cv03107
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Petitioner:
Charles E. Wynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan (ID 90459) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Willie Jordan
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Melissa Waldock, Dan Schnurr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blacklock (ID 101194) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03253
Petitioner:
Christopher K. Blacklock
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flyinghorse (ID 61773) v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2023cv03197
Plaintiff:
Orvin J. Flyinghorse, Jr
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), Tommy Williams and Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waterman (ID 126456) v. Williams et al
as 5:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Defendant:
(fnu) Williams, Jesse Hoses, (fnu) Hofarth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brice (ID 72946) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03145
Petitioner:
Derek Brice
Respondent:
Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed (ID 72142) v. Geither et al
as 5:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
Noah D. Reed
Defendant:
Gloria Geither, Jeff Zmuda, Dan Schnurr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly (ID 61483) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Terrance J. Kelly
Defendant:
Dan Schnurr, Fred C. Early, John C. Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
