Cases 1 - 10 of 183
Watson v. Wilhelm et al
as 1:2024cv06826
Defendant:
Tiam Clarke, Daniel J Wadoloski, Isaac Maysonet and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Wolcott et al
as 6:2024cv06500
Defendant:
G. Poff, L. Middlebrook and Julia Wolcott
Plaintiff:
Derrick M. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Tarantino
as 6:2024cv06482
Defendant:
Daniel J. Tarantino
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Anderson et al
as 6:2024cv06463
Defendant:
Daniel J. Tarantion and Harvey C. Anderson, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Derrick M. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Williams, Esq.
as 6:2024cv06462
Plaintiff:
Derrick M. Anderson
Defendant:
Mr. Allen Williams, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorcinvil v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Jacques Dorcinvil
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Sean Milligan, Laura Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gadson v. Houston House
as 1:2023cv08518
Petitioner:
Derrick Gadson
Respondent:
Houston House and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Contreras v. O'Meara et al
as 9:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Victor Contreras
Defendant:
Derrick O'Meara, Civlla, Tanner Nadine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Schenk et al
as 9:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Derrick M. Hamilton
Defendant:
G. Schenk, M. Pettigrass, Sergeant Shaun Purcell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Kalpin et al
as 6:2023cv06556
Plaintiff:
Derrick C. Walton
Defendant:
Off. Evan Kalpin, Hon. Michael C. Lopez, Off. Brian Flint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
