Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Scaperotta v. Hawaii U.S. District Court et al
as 1:2021cv00073
Defendant:
Shaylene Lei Maile Iseri, Esq., Department of the Office for Public Defender, Hawaii U.S. District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jay Scaperotta
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scaperotta v. State of Vermont et al
as 1:2020cv00545
Defendant:
US District Court of Vermont, Town of Ludlow, Vermont, Barry Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jay Scaperotta
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Diaz et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, John Edwards, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Kehano v. Harrington et al
as 1:2017cv00177
Petitioner:
Roland I. Kehano, Sr.
Respondent:
Scott Harrington, United States District Court, Derrick K. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Judiciary of the State of Hawaii, The et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Francis A. Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Judiciary of the State of Hawaii, The, Sheriffs, State of Hawaii, District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Borges et al
as 1:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
Peter Ray Tia
Defendant:
Dovie Borges, Corrections Department, State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
