Cases 1 - 10 of 313
PRALL v. KUHN et al
as 3:2024cv08778
Defendant:
ALLISON MYERS, GARY M LANIGAN, JOSEPH SANTIAGO and others
Plaintiff:
TORMU E PRALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DAVIS v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2024cv08473
Defendant:
SANDRA D. HILLMAN, BETTY LUE JACKSON, WILTON DWAYNE DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv07929
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DENNIS EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
YOUNG v. SCHLUSSELFELD et al
as 3:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. YOUNG
Defendant:
MATTHEW SCHLUSSELFELD, DUANE GRADE, DANIEL CACICIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETRONGLO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv01474
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PETRONGLO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PETRONGLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv23328
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MESADIEU v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2023cv21376
Plaintiff:
GUILIO MESADIEU
Defendant:
TANGERLA MICHELLE THOMAS, JOHN ESMERADO, KENNETH J. GRISPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. WARDEN, FCI FAIRTON
as 1:2023cv03028
Petitioner:
EDWARD THOMAS
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
