Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ELLIOT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv19111
Petitioner:
DAMON ELLIOT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ELLIOTT v. DAVIS JR et al
as 3:2018cv16917
Defendant:
JILLIAN KOEHLER, MICHAEL DEONEY, RICHARD JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
TARIQ R ELLIOTT and TARIQ R. ELLIOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOKS v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2016cv03300
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE D HOOKS
Defendant:
RICK PIERCE, ELLIOT HERNANDEZ and L SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGEZ v. FORMICA et al
as 1:2013cv07010
Defendant:
FRANK D. FORMICA, JOSEPH J. DEVITT, COLIN G. BELL and others
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT RODRIGEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIOT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv05934
Petitioner:
TAJ ELLIOT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GREENE v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2013cv05493
Plaintiff:
RONALD B. GREENE
Defendant:
MICHAEL PEREZ, THOMAS DOMBROWSKI, ANTHONY MARTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOLLEY et al v. FORMICA et al
as 1:2013cv05013
Plaintiff:
SHARRIK S. MOLLEY, SHAWN BRAXTON, ABDUL SANDERLIN and others
Defendant:
FRANK D. FORMICA, JOSEPH J. DEVITT, COLIN G. BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv01316
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT CONYERS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, REMENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER v. HAYMAN et al
as 1:2008cv01208
Plaintiff:
DANIEL S. BREWER
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, KATHERINE MACFARLAND, DARLENE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
EAKLES v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2007cv03016
Plaintiff:
CARL E. EAKLES
Defendant:
GRACE ROGERS, ELLIOT FAMATUM, JOHN HOCHBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
