Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Ellis v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01222
Petitioner:
Howard Ellis
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barghouti v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv50230
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Katherine Presley, Jaimi Lahman, Andrea Tack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffen v. Bielchek et al
as 1:2024cv04478
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ellis Griffen
Defendant:
Bielchek, Archer and Chaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lard v. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
as 4:2024cv04074
Petitioner:
Ellis J Lard
Respondent:
Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ellis v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv04287
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis
Defendant:
State of Illinois and William Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Zahtz et al
as 3:2023cv50052
Plaintiff:
Manuel Martinez
Defendant:
Dr. Merrill Zahtz, Macklin, Lahman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Downey et al
as 2:2022cv02189
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Ellis, II
Defendant:
Mike Downey, A Hartman, A Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Wagner et al
as 3:2022cv03149
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Ellis, II
Defendant:
Rich Wagner and Brian Currin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadway v. United States Military et al
as 2:2022cv02152
Plaintiff:
Ellis Broadway, Jr
Defendant:
United States Military, Dept of Veterans Affairs, Dept of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Heuerman et al
as 2:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Perry Ellis Hampton
Defendant:
Dustin Heuerman and Srey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
