Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ellis v. Hammon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant: M. Gower, John Doe #2, 3, 4, 5, R. Persson and others
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Amsberry
as 2:2019cv01617
Petitioner: Patric James Ellis
Respondent: Brigitte Amsberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant: Judge James R. Ellis and Multnomah County
Plaintiff: Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Young
as 2:2016cv00611
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Scott Ellis
Defendant: Stuart Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. USA
as 3:2016cv00558
Petitioner: Ellis K. McCoy
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ellis v. Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00449
Petitioner: Jason Michael Ellis
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Marion County Jail
as 6:2016cv00085
Plaintiff: Ellis Edgar James, IV
Defendant: Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nielsen v. Premo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv02064
Petitioner: Marc Ellis Nielsen
Respondent: Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Vandever et al
as 2:2015cv01055
Defendant: Boman and Vandever
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Scott Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Willams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv01389
Petitioner: Ronald Bruce Ellis
Respondent: Max Willams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?