Cases 1 - 10 of 205
Perez v. Mac et al
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Perez
Defendant:
E Mac, Brown, Castroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirby v. Brietenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
John Edward Kirby
Respondent:
Warden Brietenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed vs. Desantiago et al
as 2:2023cv01369
Plaintiff:
Demario Edwards Reed
Defendant:
E Desantiago, Mark Galvez, Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00402
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Scott v. State of Nevada ex rel NDOC et al
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
State of Nevada ex rel NDOC, Joe Lombardo, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Dialysis et al
as 3:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Chardonnay Dialysis, Brittany, Anne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Rambur et al
as 3:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Jessica Rambur, John Henley, Robert Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Quigley et al
as 3:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Quigley, Mellissa Mitchell and Melissa Michell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Taitano et al
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Taitano, Collins, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.