Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JOHNSON v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
K. BULLOCK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSS v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2020cv18895
Defendant:
MRS. KOSNER, DAVE ORTIZ, MR. EVENDGER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2020cv18900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSS and KEVIN ROSS
Defendant:
F.B.O.P AT FORT DIX and DAVE E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSS v. ORTIZ et al
as 3:2020cv18900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSS
Defendant:
F.B.O.P AT FORT DIX and DAVE E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. OFC J. SALERNO et al
as 2:2019cv19926
Defendant:
OFC WONG, RRM F.B.O.P. PATRICK MCFARLAND, LT. EICHENRACH and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B ANDERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRELL v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 1:2013cv06959
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MORRELL
Defendant:
F.B.O.P. and F.O.I.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORALES v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2010cv00150
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL MORALES
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, F.B.O.P. and HARVEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COOPER v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv02851
Petitioner:
ANDREW COOPER
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, F.B.O.P. FCI FAIRTON and PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
COOPER v. WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2008cv02250
Plaintiff:
ANDREW COOPER
Defendant:
WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ, F.B.O.P. FCI FAIRTON and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GALLOWAY v. 11 UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS et al
as 1:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
RASHFORD EMANUAL GALLOWAY
Defendant:
11 UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS and 4 UNKNOWN F.B.O.P. OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
