Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Parker v. Pollard et al
as 3:2023cv01903
Plaintiff:
Fabian L Parker
Defendant:
Pollard, Brancemonte, Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Parrales-Mero v. Warden at FCI Mendota
as 1:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
Ronald Fabian Parrales-Mero
Respondent:
Warden at FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Michael Ronier Little v. A. Valli et al
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Ronier Little
Defendant:
A. Valli, E. Velez, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin James Reid v. Bureau of Prisons Employees et al
as 5:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Calvin James Reid
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Employees, J. Vargas, M. Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) Michel v. Gipson et al
as 2:2021cv02178
Plaintiff:
Fabian Hancy Michel
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Howard E. Moseley, B. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Michel v. Gipson et al
as 1:2021cv01678
Plaintiff:
Fabian Hancy Michel
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Howard E. Moseley, B. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Michel v. Weiss et al
as 2:2021cv01640
Plaintiff:
Fabian Hancy Michel
Defendant:
Richard Craig Weiss, Alexander Liu, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uhuru v. Diaz et al
as 3:2020cv02056
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru and Priest
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso, Neil Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Osorio v. Montgomery
as 2:2020cv04052
Respondent:
Warren Montgomery
Petitioner:
Edward Fabian Osorio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
