Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GILYARD v. OFFICER FLEMMING et al
as 2:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
GERALD MARQUIESE GILYARD
Defendant:
OFFICER FLEMMING and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMMING v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2022cv02130
Plaintiff:
OPHY C. FLEMMING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, MONMOUTH COUNTY COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMMING et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv03533
Plaintiff:
EON FLEMMING
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT , M. RAWLING and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
COUNTY OF UNION
Thirdparty_defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES OF NEW JERSEY
Cross_claimant:
COUNTY OF UNION
Cross_defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. RAWLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MCKOY et al
as 2:2013cv07832
Plaintiff:
RONALD JONES
Defendant:
B. MCKOY, JOHN DOE, COUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTEE v. BAYSIDE STATE PRISON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLAND et al
as 1:2012cv07053
Plaintiff:
MARK BARTEE
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLAND, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FLEM and JOHN DOE 1, 2, AND 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2012cv03921
Plaintiff:
PHILIP GRAY
Defendant:
OFFICER FLEM and OTHER UNNAMED OFFICERS AT BAYSIDE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLEMMING v. SHARTLE
as 1:2012cv00786
Petitioner:
DEMARIO FLEMMING
Respondent:
JOHN T. SHARTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2008cv01210
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS P. SULLIVAN, ADRIENNE BARGE, ANDREA KINCHEN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
