Cases 1 - 10 of 723
Bentzel v. Lam et al
as 5:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
George F Bentzel
Defendant:
FNU Lam, FNU Deal, FNU Fergueson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and FNU George
Petitioner:
Ciaran Paul Redmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sebastian III, George v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv21975
Plaintiff:
George J. Sebastian III
Defendant:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland and Markenzy Lapointe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Evans, Anthony G. v. Petrolia et al
as 9:2024cv80625
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Evans
Defendant:
Shelly Petrolia, Anthony Perez, Russ Mager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Landreth v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
David Landreth
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and George LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crespo, Dennis G. v. McHenry et al
as 1:2024cv21015
Plaintiff:
Dennis George Crespo
Defendant:
McHenry, Huey, Sergeant Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZILL v. COTTON et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRAZILL
Defendant:
COTTON, VIRGINIA LOCKEY and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clark v. Withers et al
as 6:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Warden Shannon Withers and George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conlan v. George
as 8:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Joshua Conlan
Defendant:
Charles George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
