Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gill v. Halki et al
as 3:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gill
Defendant:
Doctor Halki, Mike Minev and J Isaacson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gill
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Shipton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Baca et al
as 3:2020cv00097
Petitioner:
Kevin Gill
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Baca et al
as 3:2018cv00180
Respondent:
Isidro Baca, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State of
Petitioner:
Kevin Rohn Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00159
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, C. Brockway, Karen Gedney and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rohn Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fasthorse et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv01858
Defendant:
District Attorney of Clark County, Sheriff Clark County and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Lavern Charles Fasthorse, Gill Singh Gurpender, Christian Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00980
Petitioner:
Gurpinder Gill
Respondent:
Sheriff Of Clark County and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gill v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00674
Petitioner:
Gurpinder Gill
Respondent:
Sheriff Of Clark County and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Baca et al
as 3:2014cv00628
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kevin Rohn Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Remsen et al
as 3:2009cv00252
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rohn Gill
Defendant:
Remsen, Dennis and Tony Corda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
