Cases 1 - 10 of 16
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. WARDEN GIBBS
as 1:2022cv01743
Petitioner:
ERIC M. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
WARDEN GIBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. PAONE et al
as 3:2018cv13134
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY M. LEWIS
Defendant:
JOSEPH PAONE, MICHAEL B. ROBERTS and AMBER J. GIBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. IBE et al
as 1:2018cv12543
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3, CHIGOZIE IBE, IDC, BURLEW, R&D and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AWAL v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2017cv08486
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMOD AWAL
Defendant:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH, RAVI SOOD, L DIAMATTEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBBS v. BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv09073
Plaintiff:
KAREEM A. GIBBS
Defendant:
JAMES ELLIOTT, DAVID RUBANO and JOHN DOE OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNS v. SIMMS et al
as 1:2016cv04729
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MANNS
Defendant:
T. SIMMS, T. HOEY, RAVI SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GIBBS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv00680
Petitioner:
KAREEM A. GIBBS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and CHRISTOPHER J. DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROUDABUSH v. MCKOOL et al
as 1:2015cv04233
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
MCKOOL, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C. DYNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GIBBS v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE et al
as 3:2014cv07138
Plaintiff:
JAMAL GIBBS
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, DONIQUE IVERY, LEEAHH RUSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
