Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Malone v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Thomas A Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. IDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
William A Malone
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Thomas A Spiller, Assistant Warden Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Lamon v. Steven Taller, et al
as 15-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW LAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN TALLER, RICHARD RUNYON, ELDON KENNELL and others
Garner v. Shah et al
as 3:2015cv00900
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Garner
Defendant:
Vipin K Shah, Gina Allen, Hardy Marcous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Jhassen et al
as 1:2015cv01147
Plaintiff:
DeLaurence Robinson
Defendant:
T Jhassen, . Liles, . Delong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Mrazek v. Michael Puisis, et al
as 15-1473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG MRAZEK
Defendant - Appellee:
GINA ALLEN, LOUIS SHICKER, Doctor, CARLA GREBY, Doctor and others
Daniel Bakalik v. Pat Quinn, et al
as 14-3638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. BAKALIK
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT QUINN, Chief Executive of Illinois, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of Illinois Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE, Tool ARB's Chief Supervisor and others
Bakalik v. Quinn et al
as 1:2014cv05510
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Bakalik
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, Salvador Godinez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman Morissette v. Correctional Officer Adams, et al
as 14-2367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERMAN MORISSETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAMS, #4779, MS. BAKER, Librarian and GINA ALLEN
Von Ryburn v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv04308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Von Ryburn
Defendant:
Officer Williams, Officer Perdomo, Salim Obasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
