Cases 1 - 10 of 29
GOMEZ ENAMORADO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06939
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER GOMEZ-ENAMORADO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOMEZ v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv04190
Plaintiff:
HECTOR L. GOMEZ
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY, WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL and CUMBERLAND COUNTY INSURANCE COMMISSION, INSERVCO INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ-ENAMORADO v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv20648
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER GOMEZ-ENAMORADO
Respondent:
ANDY CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. GOMEZ et al
as 2:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
JHAQUILL TAYLOR
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OSCAR AVILES and S. GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2023cv01266
Plaintiff:
YOUSTIN B. GOMEZ
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. DIMONTE et al
as 1:2022cv05528
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
Defendant:
D.O. RICHARD DIMONTE, FOOD ADMINISTRATOR REDFORD and AHSA G. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01389
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GOMEZ-SERPAS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2021cv19116
Petitioner:
ROSENDO GOMEZ-SERPAS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOMEZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv16638
Plaintiff:
SANDY GOMEZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ v. GRAMP et al
as 2:2021cv11019
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JONATHAN GRAMP
Petitioner:
GERARDO GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
