Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cooley v. Douglas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2022cv03169
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Cooley
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Department, Jane Carlson, Vince Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales (ID 110872) v. Wray et al
as 5:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Gonzales, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Wray, Millie Murray and James Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena-Gonzales (ID 104610) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2021cv03185
Petitioner:
Andres Pena-Gonzales
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzales (ID 54616) v. Hood et al
as 5:2019cv03099
Defendant:
Louis A. Podrebarac, (fnu) (lnu) (3), A. S. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Anthony Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales (ID 72765) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2017cv03168
Petitioner:
Gerald E. Gonzales
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Drame v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2016cv03257
Petitioner:
Daouda Drame
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales , Michael Chertoff , Ricardo Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzales v. LNU (1) et al
as 5:2010cv03153
Petitioner:
Rick Gonzales
Respondent:
FNU LNU (1), Army Review Boards Agency, FNU LNU (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2007cv03243
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Bob Hudson, Liz Dole, Pat Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Terrell
as 5:2007cv03104
Petitioner:
Artemio Gonzales
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
