Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Taylor v. Fagan et al
as 2:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
Shemia Fagan and Lavonne Griffin-Valade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hafner v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Ellen Rosenblum, Tina Kotek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. Moreno et al
as 3:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
Jorge R. Sierra
Defendant:
SIS Officer Moreno, Captain J. Cerone, Warden Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Griffin v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
Edward Arthur Griffin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00403
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hoge v. Griffin
as 6:2020cv00638
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Hoge, Jr.
Defendant:
Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2016cv00961
Plaintiff:
Trumaine Griffin
Defendant:
Multnomah County and Multnomah County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Hearn et al
as 6:2011cv00347
Plaintiff:
Jason Allan Cook
Defendant:
Eryn, Fox, NP Gloria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Oregon Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
as 3:2009cv06205
Plaintiff:
Archburt Ray Griffin
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections Medical Department, Max Williams and Bill Hoefel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Thomas
as 3:2008cv01461
Petitioner:
Charles W. Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
