Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Moret v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01757
Defendant:
Ernest Lannet, State of Oregon, Oregon Public Defense Services Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Evans v. Nelson et al
as 2:2019cv01210
Defendant:
Jose Olvera, Steve Boston, Michelle Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00064
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moret v. Oregon State Hospital et al
as 6:2018cv01105
Defendant:
Andrea Dailey, Oregon State Hospital and Poornima Ranganathan
Plaintiff:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber et al v. Oregon et al
as 3:2018cv00855
Defendant:
Alabama, Arkansas, California and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jay Barber, Chad Dykehouse, Jay David Leatherwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2018cv00301
Defendant:
Bob Gross, Guy Knight, Joshua Marque and others
Plaintiff:
David-Paul Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moret v. Garrett et al
as 3:2018cv00096
Defendant:
A. Ashenfelter, R. Bose, Branford and others
Movant:
Benjamin Barber
Plaintiff:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moret v. Garrett
as 3:2017cv01688
Respondent:
Pat Garrett
Petitioner:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Peters et al
as 2:2017cv00786
Defendant:
Doug Abbott, Lt. Steve Boston, C.O. Linda Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briden v. Alves et al
as 6:2016cv01552
Defendant:
"John" Alves, "John" Barton, Joe Capps and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan J. Briden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
