Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Henderson (PS) v. Werlich et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Maggie Mae Henderson
Defendant:
Tom Werlich, Sam Spangler, Tamara Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Mercer et al
as 1:2022cv03206
Defendant:
Keith Henderson, No Named Defedant, Wade Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Simpson et al
as 1:2022cv01303
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Elisabeth Simpson, Joel Arnold, Wade Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Simpson et al
as 1:2021cv00606
Defendant:
Wade Owens, Public Defender Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, Joel Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2020cv02136
Respondent:
Executive Director of CDOC and La Vista Correctional Facility Warden
Petitioner:
Maggie Mae Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Thomas v. Flynn et al
as 1:2019cv02192
Defendant:
Benjamin Terrell Walton, Brian Conklin, Brian Feuselier and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melnick v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2019cv01550
Defendant:
Caley, (I) Carson, (I) Caley and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Adam Melnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2018cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Barnes , David A. Banks , Demetrius K. Harper and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, C.R. Goetz, C.R. (I) Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swallow v. Goetz et al
as 1:2017cv02920
Plaintiff:
Steven Swallow
Defendant:
Goetz, Sara M. Revell, Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalty v. Krieger et al
as 1:2017cv02205
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Marcia Smith Krieger, R. Brooke Jackson, Christine M. Arguello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
