Cases 1 - 10 of 160
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. LANE et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT LANE, HARRIS, T WYATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. MERCER, et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
WADE MERCER, SALES PERSON EMPLOYEE, WILLIAMS R WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. ESGUERRA et al
as 3:2023cv24710
Plaintiff:
HARVEY LEON HENDERSON, JR
Defendant:
HENRY A ESGUERRA and ERIN AMBROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Deputy Brooke et al
as 8:2023cv02215
Plaintiff:
David Devette Scott
Defendant:
Deputy Brooke, Deputy Henderson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Jones et al
as 8:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
Columbus Henderson
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jones, Deputy Karr and Deputy Wallsier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
Joshua Douglas Henderson
Defendant:
Sheriff Bob Gualtieri and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2023cv22347
Petitioner:
NICOLE RENEE HENDERSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goddard v. Henderson Behavioral Health
as 0:2023cv61584
Plaintiff:
Ashley Goddard
Defendant:
Henderson Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Nicole Renee Henderson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
