Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
McClain Durst
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Manning v. Henderson
as 4:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
DeAmontae Manning
Defendant:
Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Henderson
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
DeAmontae Manning
Defendant:
Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. McCabe et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Delaquan D. Henderson
Defendant:
McCabe, Leana Witdress and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell v. Henry et al.
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Patrick Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher Henry, Officer Riee, Nurse Amanda Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wright v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Demarco Wright
Defendant:
Director Annettee Chambers-Smith, Warden Kimberly Henderson, PREA Investigator Thomas Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stadmire v. Henderson et al.
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Stadmire
Defendant:
Warden Kim Henderson, Corrections Officer John Barker and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shawan M. Johnson
Defendant:
Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Director's Desi B. Turner, Warden Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
