Cases 1 - 10 of 430
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. City of Decatur Illinois et al
as 2:2024cv02148
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hill
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois, John/Jane Doe and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wolfe et al
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Julie Moore Wolfe, City of Decatur Illinois, Jim Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04199
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lamar Garrett
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Pollock and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Meracle et al
as 3:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Dannie Wiley
Defendant:
Seth Meracle, Johnnie Smith, Mac-Shane Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Reuter et al
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Scott Reuter, City of Decatur Illinois, K.G. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Matherly et al
as 4:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Cochran
Defendant:
Martin Matherly, Tyler Garza and Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. Latham et al
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Semaj Ratliff
Defendant:
Latham, Mendoza, Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Stateville NRC et al
as 1:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Heard
Defendant:
Stateville NRC, Hill, Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01812
Plaintiff:
Deonte Hill
Defendant:
Perkins, Thomas J Dart and Cook County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
