Cases 1 - 10 of 252
HOLLINGSWORTH v. TIMMONS et al
as 1:2020cv09930
Defendant:
WALTER RAND TRANSPORTATION CENTER, SGT. ROWE, P/O MCCAUS and others
Plaintiff:
MARK HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUEVAS v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv00832
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, RAVI SOOD, M.D., J. HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN CUEVAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHORTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv16627
Defendant:
UNKNOWN BYRD, ROBERT HAZZLEWOOD, CHRISTINE DYNAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2018cv16793
Plaintiff:
TONY FISHER and KELLIE REHANNA
Defendant:
ANNA MORFE, UNIT DOE, MR. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2018cv08295
Petitioner:
OSCAR GILBERT
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
POLANCO v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2018cv06582
Petitioner:
ALEJO POLANCO
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EVANS v. WARDEN J. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2018cv03505
Petitioner:
HERBERT EVANS
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALEXIS v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02099
Plaintiff:
VINCENT P. ALEXIS
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, MARK S. INCH, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JEFFRIES v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2018cv01146
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JEFFRIES
Defendant:
DAVID ORTIZ, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, PENA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BELT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv13582
Plaintiff:
JERRY RAY BELT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NORTHEAST REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
